HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hirsh, J. Articles by Schünemann, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hirsh, J. Articles by Schünemann, H. J.

The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

Evidence-Based Guidelines

Correspondence to: Jack Hirsh, MD, FCCP, Henderson Research Centre, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8V 1C3; e-mail: jhirsh{at}thrombosis.hhscr.org

Since the Sixth American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy, the results of clinical trials have provided important new information on the management of thromboembolic disorders, and the science of developing recommendations has advanced. In the accompanying supplement, we provide the new and previously existing recommendations and review several important changes that we have made in our guideline development process. We made a conscious effort to increase the participation of female authors and of contributors from outside North America, with the latter reflecting the widespread use and dissemination of these guidelines internationally. The change in the title from a conference emphasizing consensus to "ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines" reflects the evidence-based approach to making recommendations. The recommendations follow the grading system described in the 2001 recommendations. If the guideline developers are very certain that benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burdens, and costs, they will make a strong recommendation (in our formulation, Grade 1). If they are less certain of the magnitude of the benefits and the risks, burdens, and costs, and thus of their relative impact, they make a weaker Grade 2 recommendation. Consistent results from RCTs generate Grade A recommendations, observational studies with very strong effects or secure generalizations from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) generate Grade C+ recommendations, inconsistent results from RCTs generate Grade B recommendations, and observational studies generate Grade C recommendations. We now use the language "we recommend" for strong recommendations (ie, Grades 1A, 1C+, 1B, and 1C) and "we suggest" for weaker recommendations (ie, Grades 2A, 2C+, 2B, and 2C). While evidence on which recommendation are made remains weak in the fields of pediatric thrombosis, thrombosis in pregnancy, and thrombosis in valvular heart disease, rigorous studies in other fields have resulted in new and strong evidence-based recommendations for many indications.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. D Blann and G. Y H Lip Venous thromboembolism BMJ, January 28, 2006; 332(7535): 215 - 219. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kunz "What's in the Black Box?" Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1): 7 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Mehta, J. L. Rodis, M. C. Nahata, and M. S. Bennett Advancing patient care through innovative practice: The Clinical Partners Program Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2005; 62(23): 2501 - 2507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]