Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silkoff, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silkoff, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, S.
(Chest. 2003;123:371S-372S.)
© 2003 American College of Chest Physicians

The Relationship of Induced-Sputum Inflammatory Cells to BAL and Biopsy*

Philip E. Silkoff, MD, FCCP; John B. Trudeau, BS; Robyn Gibbs, MS and Sally Wenzel, MD, FCCP

* From the National Jewish Medical and Research Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO.

Correspondence to: Philip E. Silkoff, MD, FCCP, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, CO 80206; e-mail: silkoffp{at}njc.org

Airway inflammation in severe asthma may indicate prognosis and guide therapy. Noninvasive assessment of airway inflammation using induced sputum (IS) could allow monitoring of response to therapy. The late fraction of IS has been reported to sample the distal lung more than the early fraction.1 We examined whether early IS collection (E-IS; first 10 min) and late IS collection (L-IS; second 10 min) of differentials correlated with BAL and endobronchial biopsy inflammatory cells in normal subjects, and subjects with mild, moderate, and severe asthma.

E-IS showed a significantly raised neutrophil count compared to L-IS (n = 18, p = 0.02) but no difference in total cell count; all other cell types, including epithelial and squamous cells, were not significantly different between the two collections. E-IS and BAL eosinophils were significantly correlated (n = 20, {rho} = 0.72, p = 0.0004) in all groups and in asthma alone (n = 10, {rho} = 0.82, p = 0.004); L-IS showed weaker correlations for percentage of eosinophils with BAL ({rho} = 0.51, p = 0.05 in all groups; {rho} = 0.81, p = 0.049 in asthma). There were no significant correlations between either E-IS or L-IS with BAL for other cell types, and no significant correlations of E-IS or L-IS inflammatory cells with any submucosal cell types (lymphocytes-CD3, macrophages-CD68, neutrophil, or activated eosinophils-EG2+).

E-IS and to a lesser extent L-IS were highly correlated with BAL for eosinophils in all groups and in asthma, but did not correlate with endobronchial biopsy submucosal inflammatory cell counts. This may be attributed to the fact that sputum and BAL sample the airway lumen, whereas the cellular inflammation in the airway submucosa may be distinct. IS could be used to monitor luminal eosinophilic inflammation but probably not mucosal inflammation in asthma.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: E-IS = early induced-sputum collection; IS = induced sputum; L-IS = late induced-sputum collection

Funded by HL-64087, AI-40600, American Lung Association of Colorado, and RR00015.


    References
 TOP
 References
 

  1. Gershman, NH, Liu, H, Wong, HH, et al (1999) Fractional analysis of sequential induced sputum samples during sputum induction: evidence that different lung compartments are sampled at different time points. J Allergy Clin Immunol 104,322-328[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. G. Tuteur
Sputum Peroxynitrite Inhibitory Activity Is Stimulating
Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1630 - 1632.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silkoff, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silkoff, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS