|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From Bayer plc, Pharma Research, Berkshire, UK.
Correspondence to: Graham Sturton, PhD, Bayer plc, Pharma Research, Stoke Court, Stoke Poges, Slough SL2 4LY, Berkshire, United Kingdom; email: graham.sturton.gs{at}bayer.co.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: BAY 198004 cilomilast COPD inhibitor phosphodiesterase roflumilast tobacco smoke
The defining feature of COPD is an accelerated decline in lung function that is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, caused by cigarette smoking and is largely irreversible. Like asthma, COPD is associated with airway inflammation.1 However, whereas the inflammatory process in asthma can be described simplistically as a CD4+ T-cell-driven eosinophilia, COPD is marked by an increase in the numbers or activity of CD8+ T cells, macrophages, and neutrophils. Long-term trials2 3 4 of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients have failed to show significant benefit in terms of slowing the progression of this disease. Furthermore, unlike asthma, important elements of this inflammatory response are insensitive to steroids,5 6 thus highlighting the need for novel anti-inflammatory therapies.
Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been shown to relax airway smooth muscle, to suppress the activation of inflammatory cells, and to modulate the activity of pulmonary nerves.7 8 The reported effects of PDE4 inhibitors in vitro and in animal models suggest that, in addition to short-term effects on bronchomotor tone, they may find utility in reducing the protease burden associated with neutrophilic inflammation, as well as down-regulating the activity of CD8+ T cells and macrophages. Such effects have the potential to slow the accelerated decline in lung function seen in patients with COPD and, thus, to modify the natural history of this disease.
Despite the wealth of publications documenting the broad anti-inflammatory profile of PDE4 inhibitors in vitro, it is worth noting certain limitations that may prove to be of importance in defining their anti-inflammatory impact in the clinical setting. It is clear that some inflammatory cells are less sensitive to PDE4 inhibition than others. Within the same cell type, different functions display different sensitivities to cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate elevation. In the neutrophil, degranulation is relatively insensitive compared to superoxide production and leukotriene B4 generation. Thus, some anti-inflammatory effects reported in vitro may not be expressed at plasma levels that are attained in humans. A further feature of their profile of activity on neutrophils is that elevation of cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate, at least in normal circulating cells, results in delayed apoptosis,9 10 which could have proinflammatory consequences.
At present, three companies have compounds that are in the late stages of development for COPD treatment (Fig 1 ). The furthest advanced compound is cilomilast (Ariflo [SB207499]; GlaxoSmithKline; Uxbridge, UK). In a 6-week phase II study11 12 in patients with moderate COPD, cilomilast caused significant improvements in both lung function and symptom scores at a dose of 15 mg bid. Roflumilast (Byk Gulden; Konstanz, Germany) appears to be the most potent of the three compounds with a dose of 0.5 mg once daily being assessed in phase II. Efficacy has been reported in a phase II study of asthmatic patients,13 but phase II results for both roflumilast and BAY 198004 (Bayer AG; Wuppertal, Germany) in COPD patients have not yet been published.
|
| Preclinical Profile of BAY 198004 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In Vivo
As is expected from this class of compounds, BAY 198004 exhibited a broad profile of anti-inflammatory activity in animal models of COPD and asthma (Table 2
). It was also an effective bronchodilator. When administered IV to guinea pigs that previously had received aerosol leukotriene D4 to induce a sustained bronchoconstriction, BAY 198004 significantly reversed the leukotriene D4-induced response with a median for 50% inhibition dose (ED50) of 0.3 to 1 mg/kg. While in standard guinea pig antigen models the ED50 of the compound was in the range of 1 to 3 mg/kg, in rat and cynomolgus monkey models the potency was higher, and the associated maximum plasma levels (ie, maximum plasma concentration) at the ED50 were 60 and 29 ng/mL, respectively.
|
There is currently no information reporting the evaluation of PDE4 inhibition in models of tobacco smoke-induced inflammation and emphysema. In collaboration with Dr. James Hogg (St. Paul Hospital; Vancouver, BC, Canada), we have investigated the effects of BAY 198004 in such a model. There is a significant inflammatory response in the lungs of guinea pigs 1 h after exposure to tobacco smoke (ie, five cigarettes). The levels of neutrophils, macrophages, and eosinophils all were increased in the BAL fluid. The neutrophil component of this inflammatory response was not inhibited at a dose of 5 mg/kg betamethasone. By contrast, BAY 198004 (10 mg/kg po) completely inhibited the influx of all inflammatory cell types. Studies are currently ongoing to determine the effects of BAY 198004 on both the inflammatory and emphysematous response that develops after 12 weeks of tobacco smoke exposure.15 In all efficacy models in which comparisons were performed, BAY 198004 was 10- to 30-fold more potent than cilomilast.
| Class-Associated Side Effects |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The long splice variants of PDE4 can exist as two conformers. One with a high affinity for rolipram predominates in parietal cells and CNS tissue. A second conformer with low affinity for rolipram is present in inflammatory cells. Most, though not all, anti-inflammatory effects are mediated by this form.19 Reducing activity in the high-affinity form while improving inhibitory potency in the low-affinity form has been suggested as a strategy for improving the therapeutic window of PDE4 inhibitors.19
When compared to the archetypal PDE4 inhibitor rolipram, cilomilast shows such an improved relative potency on these two conformers. Nevertheless, at the clinically effective dose (15 mg bid), nausea and headache still were reported, although they were transient in nature. In phase 1 studies, the higher dose of 20 mg bid was reportedly not tolerated.17
BAY 198004 shows similar relative activities to cilomilast on the two PDE4 conformers (Table 1) . Despite the lack of emesis in a ferret model, BAY 198004 produced emesis in primates. The threshold dose of BAY 198004 for this effect in primates was 10-fold lower than that for cilomilast, suggesting a similar therapeutic window in animal models. The slow absorption of BAY 198004 in humans may have an additional benefit with respect to its side-effect profile.
| Summary of Phase 1 Findings With BAY 198004 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were no relevant findings with regard to circulation, lung, liver, kidney, or hematology. The most frequently reported adverse event was nausea. The incidence of nausea was dose-related, and, as was reported for cilomilast, it occurred early in the dosing regimen and was transient in nature for most subjects.
To date, there have been no reports regarding the activity of PDE4 inhibitors against features of lung inflammation in either asthmatic or COPD subjects. However, in a recent phase II asthma study, roflumilast provided statistically significant (21%) inhibition of LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor-
production from whole blood ex vivo.20
In phase I studies, we exploited a property of BAY 198004 that had not been exhibited by the other PDE4 inhibitors so far examined. The inhibition of superoxide production persists in leukocytes isolated from blood treated with BAY 198004. This is despite the fact that this isolation involves at least two hypotonic lysis steps and facilitates the monitoring of systemic anti-inflammatory activity of the compound. A statistically significant (ie, up to 46%) dose-related inhibition of leukocyte superoxide production ex vivo was observed in phase I volunteers treated with doses up to 15 mg BAY 198004 per day.
| What Will Third-Generation PDE4 Inhibitors Look Like? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two strategies for further improvement in the therapeutic window of PDE4 inhibitors can be envisaged. The finding that PDE4 exists as four genetically distinct subtypes offers the possibility of identifying subtype-selective inhibitors. There is some evidence that such compounds can target specific inflammatory cell functions.21 22 However, the selectivity achieved to date has been limited, and there are no published data on the association with side effects. A second approach would be to further reduce potency in the high-affinity conformer. Both cilomilast and BAY 198004 represent significant improvements on rolipram in this regard. A compound described in a recent patent suggests that significant further improvement is possible.23 Whether such a compound will overcome the current dose limitation imposed by the side effects of nausea and emesis remains to be investigated.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Hauns, R. Hermann, A. Hunnemeyer, R. Herzog, D. Hauschke, K. Zech, and T. D. Bethke Investigation of a potential food effect on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in healthy subjects. J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 46(10): 1146 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Barnes New approaches to COPD Eur. Respir. Rev., September 1, 2005; 14(94): 2 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Barnes and R. A. Stockley COPD: current therapeutic interventions and future approaches Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1084 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Smith, F. Wang, K. N. Wilkinson, K. J. Savage, U. Klein, D. S. Neuberg, G. Bollag, M. A. Shipp, and R. C. T. Aguiar The phosphodiesterase PDE4B limits cAMP-associated PI3K/AKT-dependent apoptosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Blood, January 1, 2005; 105(1): 308 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Murdoch, B. Zussman, J. P. Schofield, and D. M. Webber Lack of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Cilomilast and Theophylline or Smoking in Healthy Volunteers J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 44(9): 1046 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Claveau, S. L. Chen, S. O'Keefe, D. M. Zaller, A. Styhler, S. Liu, Z. Huang, D. W. Nicholson, and J. A. Mancini Preferential Inhibition of T Helper 1, but Not T Helper 2, Cytokines in Vitro by L-826,141 [4-{2-(3,4-Bisdifluromethoxyphenyl)-2-{4-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-phenyl]-ethyl}-3-methylpyridine-1-oxide], a Potent and Selective Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2004; 310(2): 752 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Huai, Y. Liu, S. H. Francis, J. D. Corbin, and H. Ke Crystal Structures of Phosphodiesterases 4 and 5 in Complex with Inhibitor 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine Suggest a Conformation Determinant of Inhibitor Selectivity J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 13095 - 13101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |