|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Correspondence to: Robert G. Narins, MD, Chief, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, 2799 W Grand Blvd, CFP-5, Detroit, MI 48202
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Disordered Volume Regulation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although many factors underlie the damaged kidneys adaptation to maintain salt balance, most agree that the key influential forces include the increased load of solute per remaining nephron, increased extracellular fluid (ECF) volume and a variety of paracrine, humoral, and hormonal compounds that modify tubular sodium reabsorption.1 With the loss of nephrons, total GFR decreases, but hypertrophy of remaining glomeruli and adaptive intrarenal hemodynamic changes cause the filtration rate of remaining nephrons to become supranormal. The ensuing increased filtration of solute by residual nephrons permits the resulting osmotic diuresis, primarily through urea excretion, to limit sodium reabsorption. While an increasing number of local and systemic compounds have been shown to alter renal salt reabsorption, their integrated physiologic roles remain unsettled.
Clinical Implications
The presence of two normal kidneys affords great latitude in the
amount of salt one may ingest. In the face of excess salt exposure,
normal kidneys can excrete hundreds of milliequivalents of sodium,
whereas in the absence of dietary sodium, salt-free urine may be
elaborated. Increasing degrees of renal damage impose limitations on
this vital regulatory process.
Salt Overload
Patients with CRF, especially those with primary glomerular
disease, are usually hypertensive, and their BP is usually salt
sensitive.2 Depending on age and the duration of renal
damage, coronary artery disease is often present.3 The
combination of sustained hypertension and coronary artery disease
assures that many CRF patients have abnormal left ventricular anatomy
and function.4 The injudicious use of salt solutions in
the perioperative period will conspire with the aforementioned
pathophysiologic forces to sensitize patients with advanced renal
failure to pulmonary edema.
Salt Loss
The above-described adaptive forces that limit renal salt
reabsorption predispose patients to salt loss and hypovolemia when
challenged by salt restriction. Within 3 to 4 days of initiating severe
salt restriction, subjects with normal renal function can reduce
sodium excretion to almost zero.5 When salt
restriction is imposed on patients with advanced renal failure
(creatinine > 4 mg/dL), they are less efficient at reducing sodium
excretion. During the few days that normal subjects require for
adaptation to dietary salt deprivation, urinary salt excretion exceeds
intake, producing a mild sodium deficit with volume contraction. This
process is exaggerated in patients with CRF who take longer to minimize
sodium excretion and, thereby, generate a greater cumulative sodium
deficit. Thus, the injudicious restriction of sodium in the
perioperative period may spawn volume contraction, hypotension, and
diminished renal perfusion.
Perioperative Management of Salt Balance
In patients with established CRF, most clinicians believe that a
"well-filled" intravascular space will minimize any decrease in the
GFR following general anesthesia and major surgery. Although studies to
corroborate this notion are hard to find, Tasker et al,6
in 1974, prophylactically administered normal saline solution (1 to 4.5
L) to five CRF patients before surgery. Their lack of any postoperative
decline in GFR was attributed to their salt exposure (Fig 1).
In CRF patients with stable cardiac function and BP, we discontinue
treatment with diuretics and liberalize salt intake for 2 or 3 days
prior to elective major surgery. An IV infusion of 0.45% saline
solution with 5% dextrose is administered at 75 mL/h, beginning the
night prior to the day of the operation. BP and cardiac status are
closely monitored and the infusion is changed to accommodate their
needs. Although open to debate, we urge that pulmonary capillary wedge
pressure monitoring be performed intraoperatively and postoperatively
in CRF patients whose myocardial function is known to be compromised.
The various humoral forces operative during anesthesia and surgery
render such patients sensitive to fluid overload. Our unproven
assumption is that the protection afforded to the kidney and heart
from careful stabilization of intravascular filling outweighs the
complications of the procedure.
|
| Disordered Water Balance |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Water Metabolism
Synthesis and secretion of arginine vasopressin (AVP) are
unaltered in renal failure.7 Although residual nephrons
usually respond to AVP and generate, excrete, or retain
electrolyte-free water (EFW) normally to supranormally, the absolute
decrease in GFR and number of residual nephrons limits the maximal
capacity to excrete EFW (see below). The solute diuresis per remaining
nephron tends to limit the urinary concentrating mechanism (see above);
however, the normal thirst mechanism generally prevents the development
of hypernatremia. Although most patients with advancing CRF remain in
water balance until the serum creatinine concentration approaches 10
mg/dL, it becomes easier for water excess or prolonged thirsting to
override the EFW excretion or retention as renal failure
progresses. Furosemide and other "loop diuretics" exaggerate
disordered water balance by inhibiting both urinary concentrating and
diluting processes.8
Electrolyte-Free Water
One must understand the concept of EFW excretion before a rational
fluid prescription can be crafted for any patient, including those with
chronic renal insufficiency, receiving IV therapy.9
Intracellular water (ICW) overload with hyponatremia and ICW deficits
with hypernatremia are the only clinically recognizable consequences of
disordered water balance. The presence or absence of urea does not
chronically influence the distribution of water between intracellular
and extracellular spaces. Thus, the level of urea in the plasma and
urine should be ignored when assessing the state of water balance.
Because urea does contribute to serum and urinary osmolality, the
latter measurement is of little or no value in clinical assessment of
fluid balance. Only those factors that influence the transmembranous
movement of water are of physiologic importance to the assessment of
water balance. Tonicity defines the concentration of those
solutes that do influence the transcellular distribution of water.
Therefore, tonicity is accounted for by sodium and its accompanying
anions and glucose in serum and by sodium, potassium, and their anions
in urine. In the absence of glucosuria, the urinary glucose content can
be ignored. For all intents and purposes, plasma tonicity is defined as
twice the serum sodium concentration plus the plasma glucose (mg/L)
divided by its molecular weight (180) (if glucose is expressed in
mg/dL, its value should be divided by 18). The tonicity of urine is
defined as twice the sum of the sodium and potassium concentrations.
Unlike plasma, urinary potassium concentration is usually quite high
and therefore makes a major contribution to urinary tonicity. Because
potassium is confined to the ICW where its concentration approximates
140 mEq/L, it accounts for most of the intracellular tonicity. Thus,
large losses of potassium from the body ultimately derive from the
intracellular space. This loss causes transient intracellular
hypotonicity that is quickly corrected as water moves outwardly into
the relatively more hypertonic extracellular space. This translocation
of cellular water simultaneously returns intracellular tonicity toward
normal while reducing extracellular tonicity. Once the tonicity of both
fluid compartments is equal, net water movement ceases. Thus, body
potassium balance, in general, and urinary potassium content,
specifically, play key roles in assessing fluid balance.
When the serum concentration of sodium and glucose are 140 mEq/L and 90 mg/dL, respectively, plasma tonicity is 285 mOsm/L (ie, [2 x 140] + [90 ÷ 18]). Excretion of isotonic urine requires that twice the sum of the urinary concentrations of sodium and potassium equals 285 mOsm/L. Stated another way, when the sum of the urinary concentrations of sodium and potassium equals 140 mEq/L, the urine is isotonic to normal plasma. When the total urinary cation concentration is < 140 mEq/L, the urine is hypotonic. If 1 L of urine contains a total of 70 mEq of cation, it would equivalent to half-normal saline solution. This single liter of urine may be divided into two virtual volumes, 500 mL of water and 500 mL of an isotonic solution of cation. In other terms, mixing 500 mL of water with 500 mL of normal saline solution recreates 1 L of half-normal saline solution. The urinary loss of 500 mL of normal saline solution will shrink the remaining ECF space, without altering the remaining serum sodium concentration. The urinary loss of 500 mL of EFW will raise the concentration of serum sodium by a predictable amount.
| Clinical Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antidiuretic Hormone
Anesthesia, pain, narcotics, hypoxemia, and hypovolemia all may
individually, or in combination, stimulate the excessive release of
AVP. These stimuli, indigenous to the perioperative period, override
the ability of hypotonic hyponatremia to normally suppress AVP release,
predisposing patients with functioning kidneys to hyponatremia. So long
as fluid administration is carefully crafted to the patients needs,
the presence of excessive AVP is unimportant.
Fluid Replacement in Special Settings
Hyponatremia: Patients with hypotonic hyponatremia, who
clinically appear to have a normal ECF volume, have an excess of total
body water. The absence of edema is, of course, related to two issues:
two thirds of the retained water resides within cells, and the mild
clinically inapparent volume expansion reestablishes a new steady-state
salt balance. Thus, these patients excrete the salt they ingest,
albeit, in a relative small volume of fluid. Key issues guiding the
repair of hyponatremia include not raising the serum sodium
concentration by more than 10 to 12 mEq/L/d and enhancing EFW
excretion.
When the rate of repair of chronic hyponatremia exceeds 10 to 12 mEq/L/d, demyelinating CNS disorders may occur.101112 The cellular adaptation to chronic hyponatremia entails the slow export of solute from cells. The extracellular transport of solute and water from cells of the CNS diminishes their jeopardy from cerebral edema, but sensitizes them to the crenating effect of rapidly rising serum tonicity. Central pontine myelinolysis is the prototypical disorder engendered by the overly rapid repair of hypotonicity.101112
The nondialytic management of normovolemic, hypotonic hyponatremia generally entails returning the isotonic portion of the increase in urine volume provoked by diuretic therapy. The increased urine volume created by loop diuretics is generally hypotonic to plasma. To initiate therapy, it is reasonable to assume that the urine excreted will be approximately half-normal saline solution in character, ie, the sum of the urinary concentrations of sodium and potassium will equal 70 mEq/L. Thus, each milliliter of urine will be composed of 0.5 mL of normal saline solution and 0.5 mL of EFW. In nonemergent circumstances, one could simply replace each milliliter of such urine with 0.5 mL of normal saline solution. In this way, total body sodium level will remain unchanged while water loss proceeds. If 1 L of urine were excreted in 3 h, this replacement regimen will have induced the net loss of 500 mL of EFW. This protocol may be appropriate for some patients. However, if more rapid water loss is required, the 70 mEq of cation excreted in 3 h could have been replaced with only 140 mL of 3% saline solution (ie, 0.5 mEq/mL). In this fashion, a net of 860 mL of EFW would have been shed, compared with 500 mL. Increases in the dose of loop diuretics can increase urine flow and thereby increase the rate of EFW loss.
Clinical trials are proceeding with agents that block renal AVP receptors. These "aquaretics" should simplify the therapeutic attainment of appropriately rapid rates of EFW loss. Because patients with excessive AVP levels can actively excrete sodium, but not water, they can become hyponatremic during administration of normal saline solution.9 For example, a patient with AVP hypersecretion who receives 154 mEq of sodium in 1 L of normal saline solution as therapy for hyponatremia may produce only 700 mL of urine. This scenario produces 300 mL of negative EFW, thereby lowering the serum sodium concentration from water retention. Thus, the kidney extracts and excretes the salt, but retains some of the infused water.
Diuretic Therapy of Congestive Heart Failure
Failure to appreciate the need to replace EFW excreted during
diuretic therapy for congestive heart failure (CHF) often results in
"some good news" and "some bad news." The "good news" is
that the excreted isotonic urine shrinks the ECF, consequently
providing symptomatic therapy; the "bad news" is that failure to
replace the excreted EFW causes progressive hypernatremia. Many fail to
recognize that returning the EFW deficit to a patient with symptomatic,
but improving, CHF does little to change intravascular volume. One
liter of administered water distributes in the body fluid compartments
such that only 83 mL is retained in the intravascular space. In
general, until the urinary cations are measured, replacing each
milliliter of diuretic-induced urine with 0.5 mL of 5% dextrose in
water will permit salutary contraction of the ECF while preventing the
development of hypernatremia.
Edematous Patients With Either Hyponatremia or Hypernatremia
Regardless of the serum sodium concentration, the desired effect
of diuretic therapy in edematous patients is to rid the body of sodium.
The EFW excreted along with the isotonic portion of urine need not be
replaced in the hyponatremic patient, whereas it must be replaced
in diuresing hypernatremic patients. Hyponatremic patients, of
course, require further water restriction whereas
hypernatremic patients require additional water
administration.
| Hyperkalemia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The threat of hyperkalemia increases as renal failure progresses. Indeed, 1 to 1.5% of hospitalized patients with CRF develop life-threatening degrees of hyperkalemia.13 The GI, renal, and hormonal adaptations to advancing renal failure maintain stable normokalemia, despite advanced CRF. Diabetes and certain tubulointerstitial diseases notwithstanding, hyperkalemia generally is not seen until the GFR is < 10 mL/min.
Adaptations
Normally 90% of the 50 to 100 mEq of potassium ingested daily is
absorbed without the exertion of any regulatory force.14
Because potassium is secreted continuously into the intestinal lumen
and subsequently reabsorbed, the difference between the oral intake and
that in the stool reflects only the minimum amount of potassium
absorbed. As renal failure progresses, the net fractional reabsorption
of the cation decreases from 90% to as low as 60 to
70%.15 The increase in net colonic potassium secretion is
only partially accounted for by aldosterone but may be further
stimulated by acidosis, cholinergic agents, and bisacodyl
(Dulcolax).16
Accordingly, patients with advancing renal failure are generally placed on regimens of low potassium diets, being instructed to avoid salt substitutes, fruits, vegetables, etc. Constipation is also potentially dangerous because it countervails the GI adaptation, acting to enhance the net absorption of potassium.1617 These two therapeutic issues must, of course, be attended to in the perioperative period.
Although the detailed understanding of how the damaged kidney adapts to maintain potassium balance is not fully defined, certain facts are clear. The adaptation occurs in the distal nephron, entails an enhancement of potassium secretion and is only partially dependent on aldosterone.1617 Because these adaptive changes enhance the excretion of potassium, it is unusual to see serious hyperkalemia until oliguria supervenes. Disorders causing diminished renin, angiotensin, aldosterone synthesis or secretion, or renal responsiveness to the mineralocorticoid cause hyperkalemia at lesser degrees of renal failure. Various drugs that limit potassium secretion (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, amiloride, triamterene, spironolactone) predispose to hyperkalemia. Extrarenal volume depletion, by limiting the distal delivery of sodium and fluid, also limits renal potassium excretion and accounts for much of the hyperkalemia seen perioperatively.
Insulin exerts a regulatory effect on the cellular uptake of potassium. Thus, fasting patients with CRF suppress insulin and tend to become hyperkalemic.1819 Allon and colleagues19 have amply demonstrated this clinically important point in which they showed a time-dependent increase in plasma potassium level in fasted individuals with CRF that was reparable with a dextrose-insulin infusion (Fig 2). Glucose-containing solutions, therefore, should be provided to such patients who are not taking food by mouth.
|
Redistribution of Potassium
Sodium Bicarbonate: The evidence now seems clear that
alkali administration does not lower increased serum potassium levels
in CRF patients.20 Whether alkali lowers serum potassium
level in other conditions is unclear. Because of the negative inotropic
and venoconstrictive effects of acidemia, we believe that alkali ought
to be administered to those with severe acidemia
(pH < 7.20).21
Insulin/Glucose: Although peripheral resistance to insulins action on glucose uptake develops in CRF, the hormones action on potassium uptake remains intact.19 Insulin stimulates the activity of membrane-bound Na-K-ATPase, thereby enhancing the net movement of extracellular potassium into the intracellular fluid. Rapid increase in plasma glucose concentration increases tonicity and causes intracellular fluid water to move extracellularly, which in turn increases the intracellular potassium concentration. By rendering the electrochemical gradient more favorable for potassiums egress from the cell, the net uptake of the cation that insulin would have otherwise effected may be reduced. Indeed, some diabetics become frankly hyperkalemic from hyperglycemia.22 Adding 6 to 10 U of regular insulin while administering 25 to 50 g of glucose should be effective.
β2-Adrenergic Stimulation: Enhanced activation of cellular Na-K-ATPase by augmenting intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels can be utilized to lower the serum potassium concentration therapeutically. Selective β2-agonist therapy increases cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels and drives potassium into cells against their electrochemical gradient. This treatment modality is rapidly and easily delivered. Albuterol as a nebulized aerosol (10 to 20 mg) can reduce elevated serum potassium levels effectively for up to 2 h.1920 Caution is warranted though, since tachycardia and arrhythmias deriving from this therapy may compromise the cardiovascular status of patients with coronary artery disease. We maintain that β2-agonist therapy should be rendered only after all other measures have proven themselves unsuccessful, especially given the often heightened adrenergic state of the perioperative patient.
| Hypertension |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anxiety and Medications
Preoperative anxiety, pain, and discontinuation of
antihypertensive therapy may lead to severe hypertension, thereby
worsening angina and/or diminishing left ventricular output such that
pulmonary edema may ensue.24 However, diuretic medications
represent the sole exception to the rule of continuing treatment with
the BP medications throughout the perioperative period, including on
the day of surgery. Diuretic therapy should be discontinued 2 or 3 days
before a scheduled operation. However, in some patients with the
nephrotic syndrome or CHF, diuretics may be necessary for clinical
stabilization of their cardiopulmonary status. Medications that may
cause or aggravate hypertension should always be sought in the medical
record and treatment with them should be discontinued prior to surgery,
so long as "rebound hypertension" is not a complication of the
offending agent(s). Such agents include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs, antihistamines, and decongestants.25
Operative Factors
Within the operative suite, the BP may rise during endotracheal
intubation or manipulation of the oropharynx.26 Similarly,
manipulations of the urethra or rectum may also worsen hypertension.
During lower-limb surgery, hypertension may develop after the
application of tourniquets.27
Cardiac Surgery
In cardiac surgery that involves cardiopulmonary bypass,
hypertension is a common occurrence. Hypertension may occur before,
during, or after bypass. BP elevations may also occur in the absence of
any precipitating factor following coronary artery bypass surgery,
valvular replacement, and resection of aortic coarctation, presumably
because of exaggerated sympathoadrenal output.28
Other Factors
Within the recovery room, anxiety, pain, hypoxemia, and
hypercarbia may singly, or in combination, engender BP elevation.
Hypoglycemia may also elevate the BP in patients with more advanced
renal failure who are particularly susceptible to this complication,
especially those who require insulin and are routinely fasted prior to
surgery.29
Perioperative Management of Hypertension
Relief of anxiety and pain is paramount in prevention of
perioperative hypertension. Short-acting analgesics and anxiolytics may
reap great rewards in this regard, preventing the addition of more
drugs to the already complex pharmacopoeia taken by many renal failure
patients. All patients should continue taking their BP medications
until the time of surgery, even when they are allowed nothing by mouth.
In this regard, treatment with medications should be resumed at the
earliest opportunity in the postoperative period.30
Following surgery, some medications may be unable to be given, having
no oral analog. In such cases, an IV or transdermal preparation of the
same class should be used. For example, abrupt discontinuance of
centrally acting agents such as
-methyldopa and clonidine and the
β-blocker propranolol, because of an inability to deliver them
orally, might precipitate hypertension in an individual with a
previously well-controlled condition.31 This complication
could be sidestepped by simply applying the transdermal delivery system
for clonidine, with several days overlap between the "patch" and
the oral compound.30 For patients with preexistent or
highly suspected cardiovascular disease and hypertension undergoing
noncardiac surgery, appropriate risk stratification and clinical
assessment must be made.3233 In these patients, treatment
with perioperative β-blocker, atenolol, has proved beneficial,
reducing the 6-month mortality with minimal side
effects.34 However, specific recommendations regarding
digitalis, nitrates, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) cannot be
made, except that short-acting CCB therapy should not be employed to
rapidly lower the BP. The risk of perioperative bleeding may be
increased by CCBs.35 When hypertension occurs, despite the
best efforts to prevent it, and oral medications cannot be used, IV
treatment with labetalol, esmolol, enalaprilat, nicardipine, or
nitroprusside is recommended.3637383940 For patients who
experience tachycardia or myocardial ischemia with hypertension,
β-blockade is the preferred choice. However, in the setting of CHF
and hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are
preferred. Nitroprusside is usually reserved for patients with
medical-surgical crises.39 Renal and hepatic failure
patients are more susceptible to thiocyanate and cyanide toxic
reactions. Such patients require even greater vigilance when receiving
this agent and prophylactic therapy may be in order. In addition,
rarely, but disastrously, the compound may induce a "coronary
steal" syndrome. Lastly, optimization of the ECF volume with
calculated diuresis in the hypervolemic patient should be accomplished
prior to surgery.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Kraft, I. F. Btaiche, G. S. Sacks, and K. A. Kudsk Preferred treatment of hyperkalemia Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 15, 2006; 63(6): 514 - 516. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |