|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Internal Medicine (Pulmonary and Critical Care) and Anesthesiology (Critical Care), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antibiotic regimen culture ventilator-associated pneumonia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Diagnostic Strategies |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Much of the controversy about the clinical relevance of various diagnostic strategies arises from lack of a gold standard against which the techniques can be compared. As a result, the reported sensitivity or specificity of quantitative cultures of either PCB or BAL specimens have ranged from 31 to 96%.4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 This wide range reflects the fact that some studies used clinical criteria as end points (eg, response to antibiotics or withholding antibiotic treatment), some directly compared the two diagnostic techniques, some used postmortem biopsy cultures, and others used histologic criteria. Unfortunately, none of the end points can withstand the scrutiny required for acceptance as a "gold standard."9 Even histologic findings are problematic because there are no widely accepted criteria for their interpretation. This difficulty is underscored by a prospective autopsy study in which histologic samples from 39 patients were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of VAP. A positive diagnosis of pneumonia was made in 9 patients (23%) by consensus of four independent pathologists-reviewers; later, classification by one of these pathologists, using specific histologic criteria proposed by Johanson et al,10 diagnosed pneumonia in 14 (36%) of the patients.11
Current thresholds used to define a positive PCB or BAL culture have been based on factors that maximize test performance rather than on clinical outcomes. In the clinical arena, however, outcomes are paramount since mortality rates are lower when appropriate antibiotic therapy is used.1 ,2 Underdiagnosing nosocomial pneumonia increases the risk of not treating patients with this serious infection. To avoid missed diagnoses, it is necessary to accept a lower threshold for positive culture of PCB, ie, 102 rather than 103 cfu/mL, in patients with a high pretest clinical suspicion of pneumonia.9 The 102 cfu/mL threshold minimizes underdiagnosis of pneumonia while only modestly reducing the performance characteristics of the test. Well-designed outcome trials addressing the effect of a given diagnostic technique on survival or hospital or ICU length of stay would provide much needed clinical guidance. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of methodologically sound studies examining these issues. Bregeon and colleagues12 employed a case-matched study design to compare mortality in mechanically ventilated patients suspected of having VAP. In their study, the diagnosis was made either by invasive PCB or one of several other invasive or noninvasive sampling methods, each coupled with quantitative cultures.12 They, and others, found that mortality from presumed VAP was independent of any specific sampling strategy and suggest that invasive bronchoscopic sampling techniques need not be employed in most situations. Quantitatively cultured samples obtained noninvasively, eg, by blind bronchial sampling or mini-BAL, can provide clinically useful information.12 ,13
| Impact of Prior Antibiotic Use on Etiology and Outcome of Nosocomial Pneumonia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibiotic administration before onset of pneumonia has been linked to an increased frequency of VAP caused by highly virulent organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp14 ,15 which, in turn, have been associated with an increased mortality rate, as reported in several studies.1 ,14 ,15 ,16 While data thus far are only inferential, it would appear that empiric antibiotic regimens employed in the ICU should, in general, be used with circumspection after adequate culture data have been obtained, be highly active against P aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp, be used no longer than necessary, and be modified if less virulent, broadly sensitive organisms are isolated.
| Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appropriate Antibiotic Regimens |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are scant data suggesting the superiority of any particular regimen for the initial therapy of nosocomial pneumonia. In a prospective randomized trial, Joshi and colleagues18 compared piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZO) with ceftazidime (CTAZ) in patients with hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (n = 78 and 58, respectively). At study end point, patients in the PIP/TAZO group displayed significantly higher rates of clinical improvement (Fig 1 ). This difference was accounted for by a significantly greater improvement for patients with nosocomial pneumonia, who made up the bulk of the study population. In addition, the mortality rate in the group receiving PIP/TAZO was significantly lower than that in the CTAZ group (7.7% vs 16.6%, p = 0.03). However, insufficient data on severity of illness among groups were provided. The findings of Sieger and colleagues,19 who used the criterion of clinical resolution or bacterial eradication, suggested that meropenem was superior to CTAZ with tobramycin. However, nonquantitative culture methods were used, insufficient data on the severity of illness among groups were provided, and in the CTAZ group, 40% of the patients with Pseudomonas isolates received an inadequate course of tobramycin (ie, fewer than six doses).
|
| Potential Preventive Modalities |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventilator circuits are rapidly colonized with bacteria, and the condensate within these circuits can have very high bacterial counts. Aspiration of circuit condensate may play a role in the development of nosocomial pneumonia.22 Heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) are not associated with the same degree of formation of condensate, and, further, many have filtration capabilities that inhibit the movement of bacteria across the HME to the patient. Dreyfuss and colleagues22 examined the effects of using HMEs or heated humidifiers on the incidence of circuit colonization and nosocomial pneumonia in 131 patients admitted to their medical/surgical ICU. Circuit colonization was reduced with HME, but the incidence of pneumonia, defined rigorously by quantitative culture techniques, was similar in both groups. More recently, Kirton and associates,23 using an HME with greater filtration capabilities, demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the incidence of nosocomial VAP in ICU trauma patients randomized to receive HME compared with those receiving heated humidifiers (Fig 2 ). Although this trial used clinical criteria to diagnose pneumonia, the length of stay in the ICU was shorter and circuit costs associated with mechanical ventilatory support were reduced in the HME group.
|
| Comments and Recommendations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinicians and hospitals are concerned that their patients have good outcomes, and that these are obtained at the lowest feasible cost. Such costs include not only antibiotic acquisition, but length of stay, need for ancillary support (mechanical ventilation, respiratory care, bedside nursing), and impact on the care of other patients within the ICU. While much remains to be learned, increased understanding of the effects of prior antibiotic use on incidence and outcome of nosocomial pneumonia can probably help reduce the incidence of pneumonia caused by highly antibiotic-resistant organisms. Institutional prescribing practices place important selection pressures on the native microbial flora and their degree of sensitivity to commonly used antibiotics. In a group of postcardiac surgery patients, Kollef and colleagues24 demonstrated that a scheduled change of antibiotic class used for empiric treatment of nosocomial Gram-negative infections resulted in a significantly reduced incidence of VAP, especially VAP caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative organisms. In this study, the standard empiric regimen was changed from a third-generation cephalosporin to a quinolone. Interestingly, there was also a nonsignificant trend toward a reduction in bacteremia attributable to resistant Gram-negative organisms. Other studies, both in the community and in the hospital, have suggested that rotating standard antibiotic regimens or restricting overused antibiotics (such as third-generation cephalosporins) may reverse or ameliorate the incidence of drug-resistant pathogens.25 ,26
We clinicians should strongly encourage pharmaceutical companies to undertake the difficult and expensive comparative studies needed to effect improvements in both prevention and management of nosocomial pneumonia. The following suggestions for the design of future comparative studies of nosocomial pneumonia can help provide a framework for these studies.
1. The diagnosis of pneumonia should be based on quantitative cultures of airway secretions. While any arbitrary cutoff for these cultures will exclude some subjects who do have pneumonia, the added specificity will help assure the comparability of the treatment groups by reducing the chance that a disproportionate share of one treatment group contains subjects without pneumonia. Bronchoscopically obtained specimens, for the purposes of these studies, do not confer sufficient additional benefit to warrant either their cost or the small but real risk of the procedure.
2. The study population should be homogenous or homogenously heterogeneous because incidence and outcomes of nosocomial pneumonia vary widely among patient populations. Homogenous ICU populations are difficult to define, especially in multicenter trials. Hence, randomization should stratify patients according to patient type (trauma, nontrauma surgical, medical) and disease severity (APACHE [acute physiology and chronic health evaluation] II or similar system).
3. Potentially confounding variables should be standardized including, but not limited to, use of HMEs, elevation of the head of the bed, and choice of stress-ulcer prophylaxis. The continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions should also be addressed.
4. The most important outcome to evaluate in these critically ill patients is survival. While assessing this outcome requires large numbers of patients, all other end points pale in significance. Total cost of patient care (ICU and hospital length of stay) and antibiotic-related cost are also important. Microbiological outcome must, of course, be assessed but it is less important than clinical factors such as survival and shortened hospital stay.
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr. Bowton: We have not used scoring systems for evaluating or ascribing risk for nosocomial pneumonia, but I believe they might be useful, especially for systematically standardizing risk factor evaluations in large, cross-ICU clinical trials.
Dr. Weber: Our experience suggests that scoring systems are more useful in some patient populations than others. For example, in one of our studies, scoring using APACHE II was predictive of pneumonia in surgical ICU patients but not predictive in medical ICU patients. We also found that age was not, in itself, a predictor of mortality from pneumonia once other explanatory variables were factored in.
Dr. Bowton: It appears that for a scoring system to be an effective predictor, it would have to have the patients underlying risk factors explicitly laid out. At this time, such systems have not been tested in large enough groups of ICU patients to establish their usefulness.
Dr. Campbell: What empiric regimens are you currently recommending for use in your ICUs?
Dr. Bowton: We discourage the use of cephalosporins as empiric therapy because of their tendency to select out resistant Pseudomonas and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. For nosocomial pneumonia, we prefer broad-spectrum penicillins, such as piperacillin, combined with an aminoglycoside, since studies suggest that penicillins are significantly less likely than cephalosporins to exert selective pressure.
Dr. Murthy: Another important resistance problem in some hospitals is the emergence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases following routine use of empiric CTAZ. When, at our institution, we started encountering bacteremias with CTAZ-resistant Escherichia coli resulting from production of extended-spectrum ß-lactamasescombined with the more common resistance problemswe moved away from empiric use of CTAZ.
Dr. File: The new quinolone, trovafloxacin, was recently approved for therapy of nosocomial pneumonia. Might broad-spectrum agents be useful for empiric monotherapy for nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU?
Dr. Bowton: We would be reluctant to use any quinolone as monotherapy. Monotherapy did not work with ciprofloxacinwe started to see problems with resistant Pseudomonas following use of this drug.
Dr. Burgess: The 300-mg dose of trovafloxacin will provide a peak concentration of 4 to 4.5 µg/mL. Since the maximal effect for fluoroquinolones is a peak 10 to 12 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) or an area under the curve/MIC > 125, the MIC90 would need to be about 0.5 µg/mL. However, the MIC90 for trovafloxacin against Pseudomonas is 1 to 2 µg/mL.
Dr. Bernstein: There has been little clinical experience with quinolones combined with antibiotics other than CTAZ.
Dr. Burgess: We have compared the in vitro activity of penicillins plus quinolones, penicillins plus aminoglycosides, and quinolones plus aminoglycosides and have found the quinolone/aminoglycoside combinations to be less active against Pseudomonas than the other combinations.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: CTAZ = ceftazidime; HME = heat and moisture exchanger; MIC = minimal inhibitory concentration; PCB = protected catheter brushing; PIP/TAZO = piperacillin/tazobactam; VAP = ventilator-associated pneumonia
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. H. Ibrahim, L. Tracy, C. Hill, V. J. Fraser, and M. H. Kollef The Occurrence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Community Hospital : Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes Chest, August 1, 2001; 120(2): 555 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P G Flanagan, S K Jackson, and G Findlay Diagnosis of Gram negative, ventilator associated pneumonia by assaying endotoxin in bronchial lavage fluid J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2001; 54(2): 107 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Stiller Physiotherapy in Intensive Care : Towards an Evidence-Based Practice Chest, December 1, 2000; 118(6): 1801 - 1813. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wu, Z. Song, M. Hentzer, J. B. Andersen, A. Heydorn, K. Mathee, C. Moser, L. Eberl, S. Molin, N. Høiby, et al. Detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones in lung tissues of mice infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Microbiology, October 1, 2000; 146(10): 2481 - 2493. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Ibrahim, S. Ward, G. Sherman, and M. H. Kollef A Comparative Analysis of Patients With Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Nosocomial Pneumonia in the ICU Setting Chest, May 1, 2000; 117(5): 1434 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |