|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division (Drs. Kollef and Ward), Division of Infectious Diseases (Dr. Fraser), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; and the Center for Quality Management (Dr. Sherman), Barnes-Jewish-Christian Health System, St. Louis, MO.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a university-affiliated urban teaching hospital.
Patients: Two thousand consecutive patients requiring admission to the medical or surgical ICU.
Interventions: Prospective patient surveillance and data collection.
Measurements and results: One hundred sixty-nine (8.5%) infected patients received inadequate antimicrobial treatment of their infections. This represented 25.8% of the 655 patients assessed to have either community-acquired or nosocomial infections. The occurrence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infection was most common among patients with nosocomial infections, which developed after treatment of a community-acquired infection (45.2%), followed by patients with nosocomial infections alone (34.3%) and patients with community-acquired infections alone (17.1%) (p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis, using only the cohort of infected patients (n = 655), demonstrated that the prior administration of antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.88 to 4.23; p < 0.001), presence of a bloodstream infection (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.32; p = 0.003), increasing acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores (adjusted OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.05; p = 0.002), and decreasing patient age (adjusted OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02; p = 0.012) were independently associated with the administration of inadequate antimicrobial treatment. The hospital mortality rate of infected patients receiving inadequate antimicrobial treatment (52.1%) was statistically greater than the hospital mortality rate of the remaining patients in the cohort (n = 1,831) without this risk factor (12.2%) (relative risk [RR], 4.26; 95% CI, 3.52 to 5.15; p < 0.001). Similarly, the infection-related mortality rate for infected patients receiving inadequate antimicrobial treatment (42.0%) was significantly greater than the infection-related mortality rate of infected patients receiving adequate antimicrobial treatment (17.7%) (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.83 to 3.08; p < 0.001). Using a logistic regression model, inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infection was found to be the most important independent determinant of hospital mortality for the entire patient cohort (adjusted OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 3.35 to 5.44; p < 0.001). The other identified independent determinants of hospital mortality included the number of acquired organ system derangements, use of vasopressor agents, the presence of an underlying malignancy, increasing APACHE II scores, increasing age, and having a nonsurgical diagnosis at the time of ICU admission.
Conclusions: Inadequate treatment of infections among patients requiring ICU admission appears to be an important determinant of hospital mortality. These data suggest that clinical efforts aimed at reducing the occurrence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment could improve the outcomes of critically ill patients. Additionally, prior antimicrobial therapy should be recognized as an important risk factor for the administration of inadequate antimicrobial treatment among ICU patients with clinically suspected infections.
Key Words: antibiotics bacteremia community-acquired infection critical care infection nosocomial infection outcomes pneumonia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The overall incidence and clinical importance of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of microbiologically documented infections, as a risk factor for hospital mortality and other adverse clinical outcomes, has not been systematically evaluated in the ICU setting. Therefore, we performed a prospective cohort study with two main goals. First, we wanted to determine the magnitude of the problem of inadequate antimicrobial treatment among critically ill adult patients. Second, we sought to identify the reasons for the administration of inadequate antimicrobial treatment. We selected a cohort of critically ill patients for examination since they are the most likely to be adversely affected by the presence of infection.3 ,5 We also purposefully evaluated both community-acquired infections necessitating ICU admission and nosocomial infections that were acquired in the ICU. This was done to assess the relative importance of these infections on patient outcomes and to determine the occurrence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment for each of these classes of infection. It was our hope that such data would provide useful information for the improvement of existing algorithms outlining strategies for the empiric treatment of suspected infection among critically ill patients.17 ,18 ,19
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design and Data Collection
A prospective cohort study design was employed segregating
infected patients according to the presence or absence of inadequate
antimicrobial treatment of infection. Hospital mortality was the main
outcome variable compared between the two study groups. Additionally,
the entire study cohort was segregated according to the presence or
absence of hospital mortality. This was done to identify risk factors
for hospital mortality for this patient cohort. We also assessed
secondary outcomes, including the durations of hospitalization,
intensive care, and mechanical ventilation, and the occurrence of
acquired organ system derangements. For purposes of this investigation,
inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infection was defined as the
microbiologic documentation of an infection (ie, a positive
culture result) which was not being effectively treated at the time of
its identification. Inadequate antimicrobial treatment included the
absence of antimicrobial agents directed at a specific class of
microorganisms (eg, absence of therapy for fungemia due to
Candida albicans) and the administration of an antimicrobial
agent to which the microorganism responsible for the infection was
resistant (eg, empiric treatment with oxacillin for
pneumonia subsequently attributed to oxacillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus [ORSA] based on lower airway culture
results).
For all study patients, the following characteristics were prospectively recorded: age; gender; race; serum albumin (g/dL); the ratio of arterial blood oxygen tension to the concentration of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) at the time of ICU admission; severity of illness based on acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores20 ; the presence of congestive heart failure requiring medical therapy with diuretics, inotropes, and/or vasodilators; COPD requiring medical therapy with inhaled bronchodilators or corticosteroids; underlying malignancy; positive serology for the HIV; and the need for surgical intervention. Specific processes of medical care examined included the administration of corticosteroids, antacids, sucralfate, vasopressors, or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists; dialysis; reintubation; presence of a tracheostomy; urinary tract catheterization and its duration; central vein catheterization and its duration; and the need for mechanical ventilation and its duration.
One of the investigators made daily rounds on all study patients recording relevant data from the medical records, bedside flow sheets, and the hospital's main frame computer for reports of microbiologic studies (Gram's stains and cultures of sputum, blood, pleural fluid, urine, wound, tissue, and lower respiratory tract specimens). All chest radiographs were prospectively reviewed by one of the investigators (MHK), and the computerized radiographic reports were also reviewed 24 to 48 h later. In addition to recording the presence of community-acquired infections necessitating ICU admission, all identified nosocomial infections were also recorded prospectively. Patients were evaluated for the development of nosocomial infections only during their stay in the ICU. Antibiotic treatment administered in the ICU setting, both perioperative prophylactic antibiotics and antibiotic treatment of suspected infections, were evaluated using patients' medical records and the ICU computerized bedside workstations (EMTEK Health Care Systems Inc; Tempe, AZ).
Definitions
All definitions were selected prospectively as part of the
original study design. Community-acquired infection (urinary tract,
bloodstream, pneumonia, biliary tract, meningitis, and soft tissue
infections) were defined according to the patient's admission
diagnosis and the treating physician's orders in the medical record
documenting the need for antibiotic treatment of a specific
community-acquired infection. Additionally, all community-acquired
infections were required to be established within 48 h of hospital
admission. Similar temporal cutoffs for separating community-acquired
infections from hospital-acquired infections have been proposed by
other investigators.21
Patients residing at a nursing
home, skilled care facility, or rehabilitation center who developed an
infection requiring hospital admission were classified as having
community-acquired infections. Nosocomial infections (urinary tract,
bloodstream, wound infection) were defined according to criteria
established by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.22
The diagnostic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were modified from those established by the American College of Chest Physicians.21 Ventilator-associated pneumonia was considered to be present when a new or progressive radiographic infiltrate developed in conjunction with one of the following: radiographic evidence of pulmonary abscess formation (ie, cavitation within pre-existing pulmonary infiltrates); histologic evidence of pneumonia in lung tissue; a positive blood or pleural fluid culture; or two of the following: fever (temperature > 38.3°C), leukocytosis (leukocyte count > 10 x 103/mm3), and purulent tracheal aspirate. Blood and pleural fluid cultures could not be related to another source and both had to be obtained within 48 h before or after the clinical suspicion of VAP. Microorganisms recovered from blood or pleural fluid cultures also had to be identical to the microorganisms recovered from cultures of respiratory secretions. VAP-complicating community-acquired pneumonia was considered to be present if new or progressive infiltrates developed at least 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation and empiric antibiotic treatment. The previous infiltrates, attributed to the community-acquired pneumonia, were also required to be stable or improving in their radiographic appearance for at least 48 h prior to the development of these new or progressive infiltrates. Last, the criteria for VAP noted above also had to be met.
We calculated APACHE II scores on the basis of clinical data available from the first 24-h period of intensive care.20 Acquired organ system derangements were defined using the modified criteria of Rubin and coworkers.23 The definitions used for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, were those proposed by the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference.24 Mortality related to infection was predetermined to be present when a patient died during treatment for a community-acquired or nosocomial infection and the death could not be directly attributed to any other cause.
Prophylactic antimicrobial treatment was defined as any antimicrobial agent administered parenterally in the perioperative period for the prevention of infection resulting from the surgical procedure. All other antimicrobial administration in the ICU setting was classified as either empiric treatment or infection-directed treatment. Empiric treatment was considered to be present when antimicrobials were prescribed for fever or other systemic signs of infection (eg, hypothermia, leukocytosis) without identifying a specific localized source of infection. Infection-directed treatment was defined as the administration of antimicrobials for a specific clinically localized source of infection (eg, pneumonia, urinary tract, wound, bloodstream). The identified source of infection was required to be documented in the patient's medical record. Clinically localized sources of infection, excluding bloodstream infections, did not require microbiologic confirmation by Gram's stain or positive cultures in order to classify the associated antimicrobial therapy as infection-directed treatment. However, the classification of inadequate antimicrobial treatment required a microbiologically documented infection (ie, infection supported by positive culture results from an appropriate clinical specimen) to be present for the purpose of supporting this categorization. Last, antibiotic-resistant bacteria were defined as Gram-negative bacteria resistant to aminoglycosides; third-generation cephalosporins; extended-spectrum penicillins, quinolones, or imipenem; and Gram-positive bacteria resistant to oxacillin or vancomycin.
Statistical Analysis
All comparisons were unpaired and all tests of significance were
two-tailed. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's
t test for normally distributed variables and the Wilcoxon
rank-sum test for non-normally distributed variables. The
2 or Fisher's exact test were used to compare
categorical variables. The primary data analysis compared infected
patients who received inadequate antimicrobial treatment to infected
patients receiving adequate antimicrobial treatment. A second data
analysis compared hospital nonsurvivors to hospital survivors. To
determine the relationship between hospital mortality (dependent
variable) and inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infection
(independent variable), a multiple logistic regression model was used
to control for the effects of confounding variables.25
,26
Multiple logistic regression analysis was also used to identify
independent risk factors for the administration of inadequate
antimicrobial treatment of infection.
A stepwise approach was used to enter new terms into the logistic
regression models where 0.05 was set as the limit for the acceptance or
removal of new terms. Model overfitting was examined by evaluating the
ratio of outcome events to the total number of independent variables in
the final models and specific testing for interactions between the
independent variables was included in our analyses.27
Results of the logistic regression analyses are reported as adjusted
odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Relative risks
(RRs) and their 95% CIs were calculated using standard
methods.28
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD
(continuous variables) or as a percentage of the group from which they
were derived (categorical variables). All p values were two-tailed and
p values of
0.05 were considered to indicate statistical
significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
The distribution of the pathogens associated with clinically recognized community-acquired and nosocomial infections are shown in Table 4 . Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common Gram-negative bacterial pathogen isolated from infected patients receiving inadequate antimicrobial treatment (n = 53), whereas ORSA was the most common Gram-positive bacterial pathogen isolated from such individuals (n = 45). Interestingly, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) was responsible for inadequate antimicrobial treatment in 13 individuals of which six (45.2%) were classified as community-acquired infections. Escherichia coli was the most common Gram-negative bacterial pathogen isolated from infected patients receiving adequate antimicrobial treatment (n = 76), whereas oxacillin-sensitive S aureus was the most common Gram-positive bacterial pathogen isolated from these patients (n = 88).
|
|
|
Hospital nonsurvivors had statistically greater APACHE II scores, greater ages, lower PaO2/FIO2 ratios, lower serum albumin values, were more likely to have a diagnosis of congestive heart failure or underlying malignancy, and were less likely to have undergone surgery than patients who survived their hospitalization (Table 1 ). Differences in the processes of medical care for hospital nonsurvivors and survivors are shown in Table 2 . Hospital nonsurvivors were statistically more likely to receive vasopressors, sucralfate, and corticosteroids; to undergo dialysis, tracheostomy, urinary tract catheterization, central vein catheterization, and mechanical ventilation than hospital survivors. Nonsurvivors also had statistically longer durations of urinary tract catheterization, central line catheterization, and mechanical ventilation; were less likely to receive antibiotic prophylaxis in the ICU; and were more likely to receive both empiric and infection-directed antibiotics during their stay in intensive care. Additionally, hospital nonsurvivors were statistically more likely to meet clinical criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, and more likely to have developed community-acquired infections, nosocomial infections, or both types of infections than hospital survivors (Table 3 ).
Acquired Organ System Derangements and Lengths of Stay
Infected patients receiving inadequate antimicrobial treatment
acquired a statistically greater number of organ system derangements
than infected patients receiving adequate antimicrobial treatment
(Table 6 ). Similarly, acquired derangements of lung, heart, bone marrow, and
liver function occurred more commonly among infected patients receiving
inadequate antimicrobial treatment. Hospital nonsurvivors also acquired
a greater number of organ system derangements and derangements of each
individual organ system examined than hospital survivors. The average
ICU lengths of stay and the average durations of mechanical ventilation
were statistically greater among patients receiving inadequate
antimicrobial treatment and hospital nonsurvivors, respectively (Table 6
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the widespread use of antimicrobial therapy in ICUs, few clinical studies have examined the influence of the adequacy of antimicrobial treatment on patient outcomes. The role of antimicrobial treatment as a determinant of outcome for critically ill patients is probably best documented for VAP and nosocomial bacteremia. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that the administration of inadequate antibiotic treatment of VAP is an important determinant of hospital mortality.29 ,30 Indeed, the initial administration of inadequate antibiotic therapy may partially explain the excess patient mortality associated with VAP, especially when it is attributed to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.31 ,32 ,33 This hypothesis is further supported by other clinical investigations demonstrating a strong association between the initial administration of inadequate antimicrobial therapy and hospital mortality for patients with VAP.8 ,9 ,10 ,11 These four investigations independently demonstrated that patients receiving inadequate empiric antimicrobial treatment, initiated before obtaining the results of cultures from respiratory secretions, blood, and pleural fluid, had greater hospital mortality rates than patients receiving empiric antimicrobial regimens that provided full coverage of all identified pathogens. More importantly, the study by Luna et al9 found that subsequent changes in antimicrobial therapy based on the available culture results, for patients who initially received inadequate treatment, did not reduce their excess risk of hospital mortality. Therefore, it appears that the timing of the administration of adequate antimicrobial therapy is also an important determinant of outcome for patients with VAP.
Our study offers several potential explanations for the initial
administration of inadequate antimicrobial treatment to infected
patients. Prior antibiotic administration was found to be the most
important risk factor associated with the occurrence of this
undesirable medical practice. The prior administration of antibiotics
to hospitalized patients, particularly to patients in ICUs, appears to
predispose to colonization with bacteria that are often resistant to
the previously prescribed classes of antibiotics.33
More
importantly, colonization with antibiotic-resistant pathogens
predisposes to subsequent infection with these same highly virulent
microorganisms.18
,33
Several groups of investigators have
demonstrated an association between the prior administration of
antibiotics and the occurrence of VAP due to antibiotic-resistant
bacteria.31
,32
,33
Most recently, Trovillet and
coworkers34
examined patients with VAP caused by
potentially drug-resistant bacteria in hopes of identifying risk
factors for this outcome. They identified a duration of mechanical
ventilation of
7 days (OR, 6.0), prior antibiotic use (OR, 13.5),
and the prior use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (OR, 4.1) as being
independently associated with infection due to antibiotic-resistant
bacteria. Additionally, these investigators demonstrated that patients
with both prolonged durations of mechanical ventilation and prior
antibiotic usage were more likely to acquire infection with
antibiotic-resistant bacteria than patients having only one of these
risk factors. Other investigators have also found an association
between the duration of mechanical ventilation and the occurrence of
VAP due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.35
,36
An
analogous situation has also been described for patients developing
urinary tract infections and bloodstream infections. The longer urinary
tract catheterization and central vein catheterization are employed,
the more likely it is for patients to develop urinary tract and
bloodstream infections with antibiotic-resistant
pathogens.37
In addition to prior antibiotic administration, we found that increasing APACHE II scores, lower age, and bloodstream infections were independently associated with the administration of inadequate antimicrobial therapy. Greater severity of illness has previously been associated with longer lengths of stay in the hospital and ICU, the need for antibiotic administration, and increased susceptibility to nosocomial infections.3 ,4 ,5 Therefore, it is not surprising that patients with a greater severity of illness are more likely to be at risk for receiving inadequate antimicrobial therapy. Similarly, patients with bloodstream infections, especially nosocomial bloodstream infections, often have received prior antibiotic therapy and have prolonged lengths of stay in the hospital, both factors predisposing to colonization and subsequent infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.5 Additionally, several studies13 ,14 suggest that nosocomial bacteremia due to antibiotic-resistant pathogens usually occur following previous antimicrobial treatment and are associated with worse patient outcomes. S aureus, antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida spp are among the pathogens responsible for bloodstream infections, which are usually associated with the poorest outcomes.38 ,39 ,40 ,41 Interestingly, these are the same pathogens most commonly associated with the initial administration of inadequate antimicrobial treatment in our study. Two of these earlier studies39 ,41 also identified inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infection as a risk factor for mortality. An explanation for the association of younger patient age with the administration of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections is less apparent from our study results. However, younger patients may be less likely to be suspected of having an infection, especially infection due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, than older patients.
Recommendations for the Avoidance of Inadequate Antimicrobial
Administration
Based on our experience from this investigation, and a review of
the available medical literature, we have developed several initial
recommendations aimed at the avoidance of inadequate antimicrobial
treatment for infected ICU patients. First, it appears that
antimicrobial therapy should be administered early in the course of
infection to be most effective, especially prior to the development of
severe sepsis and septic shock.5
,9
This will require a
high index of suspicion on the part of practitioners caring for
critically ill patients in order to consider the diagnosis of infection
in a timely manner. To facilitate this procedure, recommendations for
the systematic evaluation of fever among critically ill patients have
been developed.42
Additionally, guidelines for the
administration of empiric antimicrobial therapy are available that can
be used as a starting point for the selection of antimicrobial agents
used for the treatment of suspected infections.17
,18
Due
to the greater mortality associated with delays in
treatment,9
starting empiric antimicrobial treatment at
the first suspicion of infection in critically ill patients seems
prudent in most instances. However, in order to avoid increasing
problems with drug-resistant infections, the antimicrobial regimen
should subsequently be narrowed or discontinued altogether based on the
patient's clinical course and culture results. This can usually be
accomplished within 48 h of administrating the initial empiric
antimicrobial regimen when culture results and bacterial antimicrobial
sensitivity profiles become available. The recent application of
computerized antimicrobial guidelines further supports such a practice
by suggesting that more hospitalized patients can be successfully
exposed to antimicrobial treatment without necessarily increasing the
occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant infections.43
Additionally, such guidelines can also help to curtail the unnecessary
use of antimicrobials and may improve patient outcomes.44
For patients with suspected infection who have received prior antimicrobial therapy directed at Gram-negative bacteria, subsequent empiric antimicrobial treatment should include coverage of pathogens that may be potentially resistant to the earlier administered antibiotics. Methods of achieving this would include selecting a new class of antimicrobial agents for the empiric treatment of Gram-negative infections (eg, a quinolone or carbapenem antibiotic in a patient having received prior treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin), including a new class of antimicrobial agents for empiric treatment in combination with the previously administered agent in order to minimize the likelihood of inadequate treatment due to bacterial resistance (eg, treatment with an aminoglycoside or a quinolone antibiotic along with a previously administered broad spectrum cephalosporin), or the routine administration of combination antimicrobial therapy with agents to which the patient has not had previous exposure and to which antimicrobial resistance is thought to be unlikely (eg, combinations of broad spectrum antibiotics directed against Gram-negative bacteria). Although the routine use of combination antimicrobial therapy with dual agents directed against Gram-negative bacteria is controversial,41 ,45 the administration of such therapy seems reasonable when attempting to avoid the occurrence of inadequate antimicrobial therapy due to antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Similar recommendations for the empiric treatment of Gram-positive bacteria cannot be made since the number of available antimicrobial agents for antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive cocci (eg, ORSA and VRE) is limited. Nevertheless, our study suggests that initial empiric treatment with vancomycin or quinupristin/dalfopristin for ORSA seems reasonable in patients at risk for infection with this specific pathogen.6 ,37
More sensitive and specific methods for the microbiologic diagnosis of certain infections may also be necessary in order to reduce the occurrence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment. However, this will require the development of new diagnostic probes and more rapid makers for the identification of specific classes of microorganisms in body fluids and tissues.46 ,47 ,48 Our study suggests that such probes should be directed at specific antibiotic-resistant bacteria (VRE, ORSA, P aeruginosa) and nonbacterial pathogens (Candida spp). Additionally, improvements in our diagnostic capabilities for these pathogens, in order to exclude infection by them, may also result in decreasing the administration of unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. This offers the advantage of potentially reducing the occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant infections.44 Finally, the more rapid diagnosis of infection due to these specific high-risk pathogens may allow for the earlier administration of adequate antimicrobial treatment and further improvement in clinical outcomes.9 An alternative to such an approach would be to more routinely include empiric coverage for Candida spp and antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacteria in the initially prescribed empiric antibiotic regimens, especially for patients with suspected nosocomial infections. However, this may result in increased antimicrobial costs and potentially further increases in the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance among these pathogens. Future clinical investigation are needed to determine the best strategy for empiric antimicrobial administration in the ICU setting.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence to: Marin H. Kollef, MD, FCCP, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8052, St. Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: mkollef@pulmonary.wustl.edu
Abbreviations: APACHE = acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; ORSA = oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; RR = relative risk; VAP = ventilator-associated pneumonia; VRE = vancomycin-resistant enterococci
Received for publication July 2, 1998. Accepted for publication August 19, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Zilberberg, A. F. Shorr, S. T. Micek, S. H. Mody, and M. H. Kollef Antimicrobial Therapy Escalation and Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia: A Single-Center Experience Chest, November 1, 2008; 134(5): 963 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Wheeler Recent Developments in the Diagnosis and Management of Severe Sepsis Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 1967 - 1976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Chen, W.-H. Hsu, H.-J. Chen, W. Chen, C.-M. Shih, T.-C. Hsia, and C.-Y. Tu Different Bacteriology and Prognosis of Thoracic Empyemas Between Patients With Chronic and End-Stage Renal Disease Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 532 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group A Randomized Trial of Diagnostic Techniques for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia N. Engl. J. Med., December 21, 2006; 355(25): 2619 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Barlow and D Nathwani Is antibiotic resistance a problem? A practical guide for hospital clinicians Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2005; 81(961): 680 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. MacDougall and R. E. Polk Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Health Care Systems Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2005; 18(4): 638 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|