Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
First published online on July 18, 2008
Chest, doi:10.1378/chest.07-1728
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babb, T.G.
Right arrow Articles by Feng, M.Y.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babb, T.G.
Right arrow Articles by Feng, M.Y.

FAT DISTRIBUTION AND END-EXPIRATORY LUNG VOLUME IN LEAN AND OBESE MEN AND WOMEN

T.G. Babb0; B.L. Wyrick0; D.S. DeLorey1; P.J. Chase0 and M.Y. Feng0

0Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas and UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75231 1Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H9

TonyBabb{at}TexasHealth.org

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough obesity significantly reduces end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), the relationship between EELV and detailed measures of fat distribution has not been studied in obese men and women. To investigate, EELV and chest wall fat distribution (i.e., rib cage, anterior subcutaneous abdominal fat, posterior subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat) were measured in lean (< 25% body fat) and obese (> 30% body fat) men and women. Methods: All subjects underwent pulmonary function testing, hydrostatic weighing, and MRI scans. Data were analyzed for the men and women separately, by independent t-test and the relationships between variables were determined by regression analysis. Results: All body composition measurements were significantly different between the lean and obese men and women (p < 0.001). However, with only a few exceptions, fat distribution was similar between the lean and obese men and women (p > 0.05). EELV was significantly lower in the obese men (39 ± 6 vs. 46 ± 4 %TLC, p < 0.0005) and women (40 ± 4 vs. 53 ± 4 %TLC, p < 0.0001) as compared with lean controls. Many estimates of body fatness were significantly correlated with EELV for both men and women. Conclusions: In both men and women, the decrease in EELV with obesity appears to be related to the cumulative effect of increased chest wall fat rather than to any specific regional chest wall fat distribution. Also, with only a few exceptions, relative fat distribution is markedly similar between lean and obese subjects.

Key Words: Pulmonary function • lung volumes • body composition • abdominal fat • visceral fat • and obesity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Chest Physicians.