Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J., Jr

Chest, Vol 82, 416-421, Copyright © 1982 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Regional coronary anatomy in rest angina. Comparison of patients with rest and exertional angina using quantitative coronary angiography

JR Wilson, JL Martin, WJ Untereker and JW Hirshfeld Jr

To determine if patients with rest angina have more severe regional ischemia than patients with exertional angina, we compared the severity of left coronary artery (LCA) stenosis in 29 patients with transient anterior ischemic ST-T changes at rest, and 30 patients with anterior ST changes only during exertion. The percentage diameter stenosis was measured with Vernier calipers as (2 x lesion diameter x 100 percent)/(prestenotic + poststenotic diameter). There was no difference between the two groups in the mean diameter stenosis of unoccluded LCA vessels either when all vessels were compared (rest: 69 +/- 12 percent; exertional: 70 +/- 13 percent [p = NS]) or when only the maximal stenosis in each patient was compared (rest: 74 +/- 10 percent; exertional: 75 +/- 12 percent [p = NS]). Total occlusion of at least one major vessel of the LCA also occurred with similar frequency in patients with rest (6/29) and exertional (12/30) angina (p = NS). However, collateral development distal to 76-100 percent LCA lesions was significantly less frequent in rest angina (4/21 vessels [19 percent]) than in exertional angina (21/30 vessels [70 percent]), (p less than .03). We conclude that patients with rest angina do not have more severe coronary stenosis than patients with exertional angina, but frequently may have more severe regional ischemia due to reduced collaterization of jeopardized myocardium.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American College of Chest Physicians.