Chest
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Whittlesey, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Whittlesey, P

Chest, Vol 81, 290-295, Copyright © 1982 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The detection of thoracic abnormalities using posterior-anterior (PA) vs PA and oblique roentgenograms

RB Reger, RG Ames, JA Merchant, PP Polakoff, EN Sargent, M Silbiger and P Whittlesey

A reading trial was conducted as part of the 1978 Bay Area Asbestos Screening Project to evaluate the utility of adding oblique-view roentgenograms to standard posterior-anterior (PA) views. Chest films from a sample of 555 workers with histories of long-term asbestos exposure were read twice as PA and twice as PA + oblique sets, providing a basis for assessing reliability through intrareader, interreader, and intermethod agreement. The ancillary use of oblique view films resulted in higher rates of detection of asbestos-related abnormalities than with PA films alone, but the increased rates were gained at the expense of reliability in the interpretation process. Depending on the source of this unreliability, which requires further study, different remedial actions might be indicated. A reader's lack of experience could indicate the need for additional training, the use of several readers, an average over several reader judgements, or the development of standards for evaluating obliques. If, on the other hand, no way is found to reduce the unreliability, the use of oblique films in routine screening programs ought to be discouraged on the basis of measurement theory, since reliability is a prerequisite to validity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American College of Chest Physicians.