Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, R
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, R
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M.

Chest, Vol 80, 465-470, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias with intravenous and oral verapamil

R Gonzalez and MM Scheinman

Verapamil or placebo was administered as a bolus infusion in a double- blind fashion to 24 patients with either atrial fibrillation or flutter and to ten patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Patients whose heart rate did not decrease below 100 beats/min were given a second dose. Of the 24 patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, 11 received placebo first. Control heart rate and blood pressure were not modified by placebo; however, verapamil significantly reduced heart rate and systolic blood pressure in the 24 patients. Of the ten patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, one reverted to sinus rhythm after administration of placebo. For the remaining nine, the heart rate was not modified by placebo but was significantly reduced by verapamil administration. Blood pressure was not modified by verapamil or placebo in these ten patients. Long-term oral verapamil treatment was maintained without interruption in 18 patients for a mean of 16 +/- 7.5 months, and 15 patients required concomitant therapy with other antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control. All patients reported symptomatic improvement, and the number of hospitalizations required for arrhythmia control decreased significantly. Verapamil is safe and effective for acute control of supraventricular arrhythmias. Long-term oral administration, alone or with other antiarrhythmic drugs, is an important contribution to the management of recurrent supraventricular arrhythmias.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.