Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mautner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mautner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J.

Chest, Vol 79, 449-453, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Coronary artery spasm: a mechanism of chest pain in selected patients with the mitral valve prolapse syndrome

RK Mautner, GE Katz, BJ Iteld and JH Phillips

A group of 14 patients with mitral valve prolapse syndrome was referred for coronary angiographic study. The group was selected on the basis that all members had recurrent chest pain as their chief complaint and all had interpreted their chest pain as serious enough to warrant at lest two previous emergency visits to medical facilities in the six months preceding the study. All were found to have normal left ventricular function, and only one had a significant fixed obstructive coronary lesion. Seven of 14 patients (50 percent) showed evidence of coronary artery spasm during the catheterization study, five of whom had histories highly suggestive of coronary vasospasm. During the catheterization, spasm occurred spontaneously in three patients, ws ergonovine-induced in two, and was catheter-tip-induced in two. Ergonovine was administered to nine of the 14 patients. The drug induced vasospasm in two patients but failed in seven (two of whom had previously demonstrated catheter tip spasm). Of those seven patients who showed evidence of spasm, four had typical chest pain in association with reversible ST segment elevation and manifested a variant anginal syndrome.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.