Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, A.

Chest, Vol 79, 406-408, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Use of lateral position test and perfusion lung scan in predicting mediastinal metastases

DA Solomon and AL Goldman

The lateral position test (LPT) accurately measures differential ventilation of the lungs when the mediastinum is mobile. The quantitative perfusion lung scan (PLS) also correlates well with differential ventilation but is not dependent on mediastinal movement. If tumor metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) inhibits mediastinal movement, then the PLS may give discordant values for differential ventilation from that of the LPT. Before mediastinoscopy or thoracotomy or both, 14 cases of lung cancer were prospectively evaluated by comparing the relative ventilation of the involved lung as determined by LPT and PLS. Seven patients who had no evidence of MLN involvement had nearly equal ventilation by the two techniques (r = .94), and the absolute difference was always less than 12 percent (mean, 4.4 percent). Seven patients with MLN involvement had unequal ventilation as determined by LPT and PLS (r = 0.07), and between the two techniques there was a difference of at least 13 percent (mean, 27.3 percent). We conclude that the LPT used in combination with the PLS is an accurate, economical, and noninvasive technique for suggesting MLN metastasis and, thus, tentatively staging carcinoma of the lung. Those patients with discordant values should probably undergo mediastinoscopy before thoracotomy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.