Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eggleston, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kindley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eggleston, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kindley, R.

Chest, Vol 79, 399-405, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The effects of oral doses of theophylline and fenoterol on exercise- induced asthma

PA Eggleston, PP Beasley and RT Kindley

The effects of oral doses of theophylline and a beta-adrenergic agonist, fenoterol, were examined in 18 asthmatic young adults. Significant bronchodilation was seen with high-dose theophylline (FEV1 increased 14 percent) and with full 10-mg doses of fenoterol (FEV1 increased 10 percent). Low-dose theophylline alone (130 mg) increased FEV1 by 5 percent, but when combined with 5 mg of fenoterol, a 14 percent improvement was seen, demonstrating significant (P = .003) additive effects. The ability of the two drugs to prevent the asthmatic response to exercise was not additive. The mean fall in FEV1 was not statistically different when subjects exercised after receiving a placebo (32 percent) 130 mg of theophylline (27 percent), or 130 mg of theophylline with 5 mg of fenoterol (18 percent). Furthermore, side effects associated with the two drugs, such as tachycardia, tremor, or CNS stimulation, were significantly increased when the two drugs were given simultaneously. Thus, little therapeutic benefit was gained from simultaneous therapy. Both bronchodilation and toxicity were equivalent to that seen with larger therapeutic doses of either drug given alone, and protection from the effects of a frequently encountered stress was not significantly enhanced.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.