Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zamel, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zamel, N

Chest, Vol 79, 273-276, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Predominant site of airway resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AF Gelb, PH Gobel, R Fairshter and N Zamel

The purpose of the present clinical research was to establish the major site of resistance and obstruction in patients with severe, symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We used a noninvasive technique by measuring airflow in a plethysmograph after patients breathed air and after breathing a mixture of 80 percent helium and 20 percent oxygen. In group 1 were 14 patients (mean age, 63 +/- 7 years [+/- 1 SD]) with bronchitis. The ratio of their forced expiratory volume in one second over the vital capacity (FEV1/VC) was 43 +/- 10 percent (mean +/- 1 SD), and their single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (Dsb) was normal (125 +/- 41 percent of the predicted value). In group 2 were 13 patients with emphysema (mean age, 60 +/- 10 years), whose FEV1/VC was 33 +/- 11 percent and Dsb was 55 +/- 14 percent of predicted. All patients had abnormally low increases in the maximum expiratory flow at midvital capacity after breathing the helium-oxygen mixture. The range in group 1 was -11 percent to +14 percent and in group 2 was -10 percent to +15 percent. Normal subjects in our laboratory show increases of at least +24 percent. This indicates that the limitation of airflow occurs primarily in the small (less than 2 mm in internal diameter) and not the large airways.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
F. C. Sciurba
Physiologic Similarities and Differences Between COPD and Asthma
Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2_suppl_1): 117S - 124S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. F. Gelb, J. Licuanan, C. M. Shinar, and N. Zamel
Unsuspected Loss of Lung Elastic Recoil in Chronic Persistent Asthma
Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 715 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. F. GELB, N. ZAMEL, J. C. HOGG, N. L. MULLER, and M. J. SCHEIN
Pseudophysiologic Emphysema Resulting from Severe Small-Airways Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1998; 158(3): 815 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.