Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mardelli, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vergel, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mardelli, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vergel, J

Chest, Vol 79, 201-205, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Tricuspid valve prolapse diagnosed by cross-sectional echocardiography

TJ Mardelli, J Morganroth, CC Chen, M Naito and J Vergel

Cross-sectional echocardiography utilizing the apical and longitudinal right ventricular inflow tract views was used to investigate the tricuspid valve in 64 patients with mitral valve prolapse and 16 controls who had no angiographic or echocardiographic evidence of mitral valve prolapse. The tricuspid valve leaflets and their coaptation point in systole were found to be below (towards the right ventricular apex) the level of the tricuspid valve ring in systole in all controls. Tricuspid valve prolapse, defined as the leaflet(s) of the tricuspid valve lying above the tricuspid valve ring level within the right atrium, was seen in 31/64(48 percent) of patients with mitral valve prolapse. The right ventricular inflow tract view demonstrated tricuspid valve prolapse most readily compared to the apical view, and 29 of the 31 patients with tricuspid valve prolapse had prolapse of at least two leaflets of the tricuspid valve. The 31 patients with both mitral and tricuspid valve prolapse, when compared to the 33 patients with mitral valve prolapse alone, had more symptomatology and abnormal physical findings.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.