Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pupello, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sbar, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pupello, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sbar, S

Chest, Vol 74, 163-166, Copyright © 1978 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Surgical management of the small aortic annulus. Hemodynamic evaluation

DF Pupello, RH Blank, LN Bessone, E Harrison and S Sbar

Replacement of the aortic valve can be accomplished with ease and safety in most instances. The presence of a small aortic root, however, remains a problem in that both mechanical and stent-mounted tissue valves produce higher resting gradients in the smaller sizes. To avoid this, a technique has been developed to enlarge the aortic annulus. In a series of 253 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, 22 required division of the aortic annulus. Extension of the incision inferiorly to the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and a resulting separation of the annulus facilitated implantation of a larger valve. The resulting defect is obliterated with a woven Dacron patch. Hemodynamic data obtained on 12 patients who had recatheterization one to ten months postoperatively disclosed an average resting transvalvular gradient of 13.5 mm Hg. This procedure has been used successfully in combined aortic and mitral valve replacement and heart block has not occurred. Based upon encouraging follow-up studies of the Hancock glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine heterograft, we use this prosthesis in patients with annular diameters of less than 25 mm. Our experience suggests that enlargement of the aortic annulus is necessary in a significant number of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
I. Knez, R. Rienmuller, R. Maier, P. Rehak, B. Schrottner, H. Machler, M. Anelli-Monti, and B. Rigler
Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American College of Chest Physicians.