Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sethi, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Takaro, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sethi, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Takaro, T.
(Chest. 1973;64:235-240.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Myocardial Revascularization by Internal Thoracic Arterial Implants: Longterm Follow-up

Gulshan K. Sethi M.D.1; Stewart M. Scott M.D.1; and Timothy Takaro M.D.1

1 Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Veterans Administration Hospital, Oteen, N.C.

A 100 percent follow-up report on 198 patients who underwent implantation of either a single internal thoracic artery (185 patients) or both arteries (13 patients) into the left ventricular myocardium up to ten and a half years after operation, is presented. Surgical (30-day) mortality was 8.5 percent. Implant arteriograms, performed in 89 percent of the survivors one year after operation, were graded according to the degree of opacification of the implant and the collateralized coronary artery. It was not possible to correlate symptomatic improvement, incidence of myocardial infarction after operation, or survival rate with the degree of opacification of vessels at implant arteriography, even in those patients with single implants in whom myocardial ischemia was lmited to the area of the implant. The cumulative survival curve based on these cases did not show any significant difference from that reported by others for patients with angina pectoris who were not treated surgically.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.