Chest
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prakash, R.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, H. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prakash, R.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, H. J. C.
(Chest. 1973;64:7-9.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Hemodynamic Effects of Postural Changes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Ravi Prakash M.D.1; W. W. Parmley M.D.1; Krishna Dikshit M.D.1; James Forrester M.D.1; and H. J. C. Swan M.D.1

1 Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles

In order to evaluate optimum patient position following acute myocardial infarction, hemodynamics were studied in 21 patients in the supine and semierect posture (70 degree head and thorax elevation with legs horizontal). None of the patients was in acute pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock. Cardiac output (thermodilution technique) and right-sided pressure measurements were obtained with a triple lumen flow-directed balloon catheter. Following a change from the supine to semierect posture, right atrial pressure rose from an average of 6 to 9 mm Hg (p < .001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure rose from 27 to 30 mm Hg (p < .01), and left ventricular filling pressure rose from 11 to 14 mm Hg (p < .01 ). There were insignificant changes in heart rate, arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, left ventricular stroke work, and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. Hemodynamic responses were similar in patients with or without left ventricular failure. Thus, there were no hemodynamic advantages of either position in this group of patients. Results suggest that the patient's preference for comfort is a reasonable guide to nursing position, since there were no hemodynamic changes of importance.

Submitted on December 18, 1972
Accepted on January 31, 1973







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.