Chest
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dhingra, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dhingra, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S. H.
(Chest. 1973;64:55-59.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Normal Conduction Intervals and Responses in Sixty-One Patients Using His Bundle Recording and Atrial Pacing

Ramesh C. Dhingra M.D.1; Kenneth M. Rosen M.D.2; and Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola M.D., F.C.C.P.3

1 Fellow, Department of Adult Cardiology, Cook County Hospital; Assistant in Medicine, Abraham Lincoln School of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago
2 Chief, Section of Cardiology and Associate Professor of Medicine, Abraham Lincoln School of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago
3 Professor of Medicine, University of Oregon Medical School, University of Oregon, Portland

In the present study, His bundle electrograms (H) were recorded in 61 patients without evidence of conduction disease on the surface electrocardiogram, in order to establish the normal range of conduction intervals. The conduction intervals (in msec) were as follows (mean ± 2 SD): P-H 119 ± 119 ± 38; P-A 27 ± 18; A-H 92 ± 38 and H-V 43 ± 12. Atrial pacing was performed in 45 patients. Thirty patients developed Wenckebach periods proximal to H at a mean rate of 146/min; the others maintained intact A-V conduction up to a maximum paced rate of 160 to 200/min. Sinus node recovery time (SRT) was also measured in 34 of the patients and found to be 988 ± 692 msec (mean ± 2 SD). None of the measurements was significantly different when males were compared to females, or when patients above and below age 45 years were compared. The values reported will be of use in assessing patients with suspected cardiac conduction disease.

Submitted on August 17, 1972
Accepted on January 2, 1973







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.