Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamby, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Hartstein, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamby, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Hartstein, M.
(Chest. 1973;64:46-50.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Intractable Angina Pectoris in the 65 to 79 Year Age Group: A Surgical Approach

Robert I. Hamby M.D, F.C.C.P.1; B. George Wisoff M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Paul Kolker M.D., F.C.C.P.1; and Marvin Hartstein M.D.1

1 Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division (Dr. Hamby) and Surgery, Cardiovascular Division (Drs. Wisoff, Kolker and Hartstein), Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, Queens Hospital Center Affiliation, Jamaica, New York and the School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook New York

Twenty-six patients in an older age group (range 65-79) referred because of intractable angina pectoris revealed, with few exceptions, no significant differences in clinical features, hemodynamic and angiographic findings when compared to 150 younger patients (range 30-64) referred for similar reasons. The older patients were generally sicker because of physician delay in arriving at a decision for angiographic evaluation. The male-female ratio was lower in the older age group. The duration of angina pectoris and the extent of the coronary artery disease revealed no significant differences when comparing the older patients with the younger patients. Left ventricular function revealed no significant differences. Five patients were rejected for surgery because of diffuse coronary artery disease or poor left ventricular function. Two patients sustained acute myocardial infarctions while waiting for surgery and one died. Seventeen patients underwent aortocoronary bypass surgery and were compared with 100 patients less than 65 years of age who also underwent aortocoronary bypass surgery. The mortality rate (16 percent), postoperative course, length of stay in the hospital and immediate graft closure frequency (5 percent) were entirely comparable to results in the younger patients. Our experience indicates that the age of the patient should not be considered a factor in determining whether a patient should be evaluated for aortocoronary bypass surgery.

Submitted on November 10, 1972
Accepted on January 25, 1973







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.