Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicotra, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicotra, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, A. A.
(Chest. 1973;64:10-15.)
© 1973 American College of Chest Physicians

Physiologic Evaluation of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Ventilation

M. Brooke Nicotra M.D.1; Jose Viroslav M.D.1; Paul M. Stevens M.D.1; and Antonio A. Alvarez M.D.1

1 Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and the Pulmonary Disease Section, The Methodist Hospital, Houston

The physiologic effects of positive end expiratory pressure ventilation (PEEP) were studied in 36 patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to non- obstructive lung disease. Arterial oxygen content increased in all patients while mixed venous oxygen content rose in half of them. Calculated arterial-venous oxygen content differences did not change for the group as a whole while physiologic shunt fraction decreased markedly. Very few deleterious effects of this method of ventilation were noted except for a 14 percent incidence of pneumothorax. The mean time that PEEP was required was 2.8 days and prognosis seemed to be related to the etiology of the respiratory failure. An increase in mixed venous oxygen content during PEEP seemed to impart a good prognosis and occurred more frequently among patients with respiratory failure following cardiovascular surgery; most of these patients survived their respiratory failure and over half were eventually discharged. In contrast only one of 14 patients with respiratory failure due to other causes survived after requiring the use of PEEP.

Submitted on November 20, 1972
Accepted on January 5, 1973







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American College of Chest Physicians.