|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 Cardio-Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, and the Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, New York City
Marked symptomatic sinus bradycardia was treated by permanent pervenous Bifocal (sequential atrioventricular) demand pacemaker (BFD) implantation in four patients. The specific mode of operation and the complications encountered are analyzed. In the group of implants, six different BFD pulse generators were used; two of these generators underwent premature battery failure, one developed runaway and a fourth, premature circuit instability. Improper position or later displacement of the J-shaped atrial electrode prompted a special problemventricular stimulator inhibition. This self-inhibition is unique to this variety of generator and requires repositioning of the atriel electrode. The longterm high drain of energy and the electrical instability of the pulse generator are problems remaining to be solved before this mode of pacing can reach its full potential use.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Jeffrey and V. Parsonnet Cardiac Pacing, 1960–1985 : A Quarter Century of Medical and Industrial Innovation Circulation, May 19, 1998; 97(19): 1978 - 1991. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |