Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodhead, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodhead, M.
(Chest. 1998;113:183S-187S.)
© 1998 American College of Chest Physicians

Community-Acquired Pneumonia Guidelines—An International Comparison

A View From Europe

Mark Woodhead DM1

1 From the Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

Following an outline that details the pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) identified in studies from Europe, this article reviews the guidelines for the management of CAP in four European countries—France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The method behind the development of each document is described, followed by a comparison of the scope of each document. All four documents provide guidelines for the management of two groups of patients—the severely ill and the nonseverely ill patient. A penicillin or macrolide feature for the nonseverely ill and the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide for the severely ill patient are described in all four guidelines. Despite their different origins and methods, these four guidelines have more similarities than differences—the latter serving to emphasize some of the areas that require further research in this important condition. An important area for research is the impact that these guidelines have on practice and especially on clinical outcomes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians.