Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, M. J.
(Chest. 1998;113:24S-27S.)
© 1998 American College of Chest Physicians

New Chemotherapeutic Agents in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

The Australian Experience

Michael J. Boyer MD1

1 From the Department of Medical Oncology, Sydney Cancer Center, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

The disappointing results obtained with currently available chemotherapy for lung cancer has led to the development of several new agents over the past 5 years. These include paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and the camptothecins, irinotecan and topotecan. To date, phase I and II clinical trials with paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and combinations containing these drugs have been performed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Australia. These trials have produced overall response rates of 10 to 40%, which are similar to the rates obtained in other studies with these agents. In general, the agents have been well tolerated. However, these studies cannot be compared with previous studies employing conventional chemotherapeutic agents, primarily because the results of the former studies may have been skewed due to enrollment of younger, healthier patients and a variable proportion of patients with locally advanced rather than metastatic disease. Randomized controlled trials will be needed to determine whether use of these newer agents is associated with improvements in survival, palliation, and/or toxic reactions when compared with currently used regimens.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians.