Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
(Chest. 1994;106:313S-317S.)
© 1994 American College of Chest Physicians

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

David H. Johnson MD1

1 From the Division of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Lung Cancer Study Group conducted a series of adjuvant chemotherapy trials in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Although some of these trials yielded modest survival benefit, the length of improved survival essentially equaled the time spent receiving chemotherapy. Consequently, few physicians routinely employ postoperative chemotherapy in spite of its theoretical appeal. Possible explanations for the failure of adjuvant chemotherapy to provide meaningful prolongation of survival in non-small cell lung cancer include lack of effective chemotherapy, incorrect chemotherapy regimen, inadequate dose intensity, and possibly inadequate trial design. Future postoperative adjuvant trials should focus on treating patients with resected early stage lesions (T1N1, T2N1, T2N0). What role, if any, newer antineoplastic agents will play in the postoperative setting remains to be determined. Neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy may well prove to be a superior treatment strategy and deserves further investigation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.