Chest, Vol 101, 948-952, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of peak flowmeters at 1,400 m

RM Gardner, RO Crapo, BR Jackson and RL Jensen
LDS Hospital/University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84143.

Peak flow meters provide physicians and patients with objective measures about changes in pulmonary obstruction. We evaluated eight models of peak flowmeters and measured their accuracy and reproducibility with methods recently recommended by the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP). Waveforms from the American Thoracic Society's spirometer testing set were used to drive a computer- controlled syringe. Testing was done at Salt Lake City at an altitude 1,400 m. It appears that the original Wright peak flowmeter has been used as the "de facto" standard. We found that the original Wright peak flowmeter overestimated flows in its midrange; and, as a consequence, most of the other peak flowmeters also overestimated peak flows. The overestimation of peak flows may have been understated because of the 1,400-m altitude testing site. To the credit of the instrument manufacturers, we were pleasantly surprised with the quality, accuracy, and reproducibility of presently available peak flowmeters; however, as a result of our testing, we suspect that with little effort, manufacturers of peak flowmeters could improve the accuracy of their devices. Standardized testing methods and equipment should make the task of peak flowmeter design, manufacture, and testing even easier. We trust that manufacturers of peak flowmeters will respond appropriately and improve their instruments.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Stout, C. M. Visness, P. Enright, C. Lamm, G. Shapiro, V. N. Gan, G. K. Adams III, and H. E. Mitchell Classification of Asthma Severity in Children: The Contribution of Pulmonary Function Testing Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2006; 160(8): 844 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Fonseca, A. Costa-Pereira, L. Delgado, L. N. Silva, M. Magalhaes, M. G. Castel-Branco, and M. Vaz Pulmonary Function Electronic Monitoring Devices: A Randomized Agreement Study Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1258 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. MILLER, B. JONES, Y. XU, O. F. PEDERSEN, and P. H. QUANJER Peak Expiratory Flow Profiles Delivered by Pump Systems . Limitations due to Wave Action Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2000; 161(6): 1887 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. T. Ferguson, P. L. Enright, A. S. Buist, and M. W. Higgins Office Spirometry for Lung Health Assessment in Adults: A Consensus Statement From the National Lung Health Education Program Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4): 1146 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G Ayres, J. F Miles, and P. J Barnes Brittle asthma Thorax, April 1, 1998; 53(4): 315 - 321. [Full Text]

				C. G. IRVIN, R. J. MARTIN, V. M. CHINCHILLI, S. J. KUNSELMAN, and R. M. CHERNIACK Quality Control of Peak Flow Meters for Multicenter Clinical Trials Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 396 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M R Miller and P H Ouanjer Peak Flow meters: a problem of scale BMJ, February 26, 1994; 308(6928): 548 - 549. [Full Text]