Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inbar, O
Right arrow Articles by Daskalovich, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Inbar, O
Right arrow Articles by Daskalovich, J

Chest, Vol 100, 1229-1234, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The effect of body posture on exercise- and hyperventilation-induced asthma

O Inbar, S Naiss, E Neuman and J Daskalovich
Department of Research and Sport Medicine, Wingate Institute Netania, Haifa, Israel.

Recent studies have shown that swimming is of relatively low asthmogenicity, even under conditions of high respiratory heat (and/or water) loss (RHL). It has been suggested that the horizontal body position may contribute to swimming's low asthmogenicity. We studied the effects of upright and prone body postures on pulmonary function following exercise (EIA) and after nonexercise hyperventilation (HIA). Twelve asthmatic boys (aged 12 to 16 years) underwent two 8-min exercise sessions of shoulder flexion-extension and two 8-min isocapnic hyperventilation treatments, in a counterbalanced order, either while lying prone or standing upright. All tests were carried out in a climatic chamber at 10 +/- 1 degree C and 31 +/- 2 percent relative humidity. Minute ventilation (VE) was kept constant at a predetermined individual level during all treatments. No differences were observed in pulmonary functions between the prone and upright postures following either exercise (FEV1 = -20.5 +/- 18.7 percent vs -22.2 +/- 18.7 percent, respectively) or hyperventilation (FEV1 = -29.6 +/- 19.0 percent vs -29.7 +/- 20.2 percent). We conclude that body posture on land has no meaningful effect on the severity of bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children; however, in view of some conceivable physiologic benefits of the prone position in water, an interactive effect on swimming-induced asthma (SIA) of body posture and water immersion cannot be ruled out.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.