Chest
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pujol, J.
Right arrow Articles by Michel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pujol, J.
Right arrow Articles by Michel, F.

Chest, Vol 100, 644-648, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Bacterial ribosomal immunostimulants prime alveolar macrophages in vivo to produce interleukin 1 in vitro

JL Pujol, B Klein, P Godard, L Dussourd d'Hinterland and FB Michel
Hopital l'Aiguelongue, Montpellier, France.

Alveolar macrophages (AMs) may play a key role in human respiratory immune defenses, partially by synthesizing and releasing interleukin 1 (IL = 1). D53 (Ribomunyl), a composite bacterial ribosomal immunostimulant, has been recognized as an efficient prevention of respiratory tract infections. In vitro, D53 enhances the IL-1 production by mouse spleen adherent cells. A thymocyte proliferative response assay was used to evaluate the in vitro IL-1 production by AMs in healthy subjects who received D53 immunostimulant. Twelve nonsmoking healthy subjects took part in a prospective double-blind placebo control study. On day 1, a first bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed to assess IL-1 production by unstimulated and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated AM. Then, subjects were randomized to receive D53 (n = 6) or its placebo (n = 6) by both oral and subcutaneous injection routes from day 1 to day 15. On day 15, a second BAL was done and AM IL-1 production was again tested. IL-1 production on day 15 did not significantly differ from day 1 in both D53-treated and placebo groups either when AMs were unstimulated or were stimulated with concentrations of LPS resulting in maximal IL-1 production. However, in the D53-treated group, but not in the placebo group, IL-1 production induced by low LPS concentration (5 mg/L) was significantly higher (mean +/- SEM: 1,238 +/- 287 U/10(6) AM) on day 15 in comparison with day 1 (577 +/- 113 U/10(6) AM; p less than 0.05, Wilcoxon W test) and in comparison with the control group (day 15 IL-1 production induced by 5 mg/L LPS, 758 +/- 175 U/10(6) AM; p less than 0.05, Mann- Whitney U test). Moreover, in the D53-treated group, the optimal LPS concentration (ie, LPS concentration that induced maximal IL-1 production) was significantly lower on day 15 (mean +/- SD: 11 +/- 7 mg/L) than on day 1 (16 +/- 7 mg/L; p less than 0.05 Wilcoxon W test). We conclude that D53 immunostimulant in vivo primes AM to produce IL-1 following low LPS concentration stimulation. This may partially explain the protective effect of D53 immunostimulant against respiratory tract infection.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.