Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misset, B
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Misset, B
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, G

Chest, Vol 100, 160-163, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Heat and moisture exchanger vs heated humidifier during long-term mechanical ventilation. A prospective randomized study

B Misset, B Escudier, D Rivara, B Leclercq and G Nitenberg
Service de Reanimation Medicochirurgicale, Institut G. Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Adequate humidification of inspired gases with HMEs during long-term MV remains controversial. In this study, a comparison is made between tracheal secretions during long-term MV either with HME or conventional HH. Both the HME and HH groups were similar with respect to age, sex, diagnosis, duration of MV, SAPS and mortality. Temperature of gases in the tracheal tube was lower and the amount of tracheal instillations was greater in the HME group than in the HH group. Tracheal secretions became thicker between day 1 (control) and day 5, in the HME group than in the HH group. Four and two tube occlusions occurred in HME and HH groups, respectively. Tracheal bacterial colonization was similar in the two groups. Given the advantages of HME (reduced nurses' work and financial cost), HME could be routinely used under cautious surveillance and replaced by HH if difficulty in suctioning occurs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
L. Lorente, S. Blot, and J. Rello
Evidence on measures for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2007; 30(6): 1193 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J.-D. RICARD, E. LE MIÈRE, P. MARKOWICZ, S. LASRY, G. SAUMON, K. DJEDAÏNI, F. COSTE, and D. DREYFUSS
Efficiency and Safety of Mechanical Ventilation with a Heat and Moisture Exchanger Changed Only Once a Week
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2000; 161(1): 104 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 ChestHome page
J.-D. Ricard, P. Markowicz, K. Djedaini, L. Mier, F. Coste, and D. Dreyfuss
Bedside Evaluation of Efficient Airway Humidification During Mechanical Ventilation of the Critically Ill
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1646 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
D. Cook, B. De Jonghe, L. Brochard, and C. Brun-Buisson
Influence of Airway Management on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Evidence From Randomized Trials
JAMA, March 11, 1998; 279(10): 781 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.